No. 18-9160
Radomysl Twardowski v. Bismarck Police Department, et al.
IFP
Tags: civil-rights due-process jury-trial mental-health right-to-counsel statute-of-limitations civil-commitment civil-rights constitutional-provisions criminal-sentencing defendant-rights due-process judicial-discretion mental-health psychological-treatment right-to-counsel statute-of-limitations
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. SHOULD THERE BE A STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ON GRAVE MORAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PHYSICAL PERSONAL INJURIES ACTIONS WHICH CONTRIBUTE SIGNIFICANTLY TO WRONGFUL DESTRUCTION OF THE FAMILY, CAUSE DERAILMENT OF ONE'S PROFESSIONAL CAREER AND LIFE IN GENERAL.
2. THIS IS A CASE OF SERIOUS VIOLATIONS OF CIVIC RIGHTS OF DUE PROCESS, PETITIONER PRIVACY OF HOME THE 'STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS' LINE OF DEFENSE, WHICH NEVER TOOK UP THE ASSERTIONS AD MERITUM
3. WHY DID THE COURT RULE ON MOTION WHEN I WAS REQUESTING A JURY TRIAL
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the civil commitment of a person based solely on a mental health evaluation violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-04-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 5, 2019)
Attorneys
Radomysl Twardowski
Radomysl Twardowski — Petitioner