No. 18-9151
Blake Joseph Sandlain v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 6th-amendment appellate-counsel capital-punishment criminal-procedure effective-assistance-of-counsel habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel prejudice successive-petition
Latest Conference:
2019-05-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel require a showing of prejudice to establish a claim that appellate counsel was ineffective?
Docket Entries
2019-08-23
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-08-01
DISTRIBUTED.
2019-06-20
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-06-03
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2019.
2019-05-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-04-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 5, 2019)
Attorneys
Blake Joseph Sandlain
Blake Sandlain — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent