No. 18-9148

Ikemefula Charles Ibeabuchi v. James T. Blomo

Lower Court: Arizona
Docketed: 2019-05-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion civil-procedure court-rules due-process judicial-review jurisdiction legal-procedure motion-to-dismiss pro-se standing statutory-interpretation summary-judgment
Latest Conference: 2019-05-30
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether or not the Honorable Margaret Mahoney Should had issued Civil Procedure, Rule 7, to reply to Defendant/Appelles Motion to Dismiss, as a minimal level of due process, required for the ProSe litigant before signing, as the Maricopa County Superior Court?

Whether or not, Judge Mahoney, Committed a reversible erron when she ordered Judgment entered in favor of Defendant Judge dant and the Plaintiff as Parties in the Case?

Whether or not, Judge Mahoney, acted in excess of her Jurisdiction and abuse of discretion n by receiving and signing a pre2017, as Order Signed on, Nov 13 2017?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Honorable Margaret Mahoney should have issued a court order for the pro se litigant to reply to the defendant's motion to dismiss, as a minimal level of due process

Docket Entries

2019-06-03
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2019-05-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2019.
2019-05-06
Waiver of right of respondent James T. Blomo to respond filed.
2019-04-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 5, 2019)

Attorneys

Ikemefula Charles Ibeabuchi
Ikemefula Charles Ibeabuchi — Petitioner
James T. Blomo
Daniel Patrick SchaackArizona Atty. General, Respondent