No. 18-9145
John Patrick Fletcher v. Inmate Bank, et al.
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process prisoner-complaint prisoner-rights pro-se rule-8 standard-of-review standing supervisory-power
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the lower courts' failure/refusal to follow this Court's standard of review for pro se prisoner complaints under Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) as held in Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89 (2007) and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009) requires exercise of this Court's supervisory power.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower courts' failure/refusal to follow this Court's standard of review for pro se prisoner complaints under Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) as held in Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89 (2007) and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009) requires exercise of this Court's supervisory power
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-04-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 5, 2019)
Attorneys
John Patrick Fletcher
John Patricl Fletcher — Petitioner