Delroy T. Booth v. Trevonza Bobbitt, Warden, et al.
I Wow Can Me Couch oF AR PRS For Lhe ENevendy rcuth DiS ge
My APRRA\ By SNating "Failed Yo Pay the Dock ering 8 Fi Ving Fees bg Wherg
iy Cleasly Shakes on AS Can ix B onrne Dake o€ WQ0)1R onder Arann
Meation Kot leave vo Pro ceed inYor Ma Pauhe ris ® J
aX. Kaw Can My Akal BeDismigsed Where A Nearly Stokes ON EX iy D iq
os ae hae < ee Onde Dore, oF WH) Qorg — Wag
Charged 350 Datars For € Rera\ Qovek yy
a) W\ocee Divkren vek Fy AY FEE Fon dhe Federal
3.Did de Federal Courk Coc ne Macon Divig x
. '\y WOMEKEWeysh Fond Accound Fre \Q aes ee "ve Ary \engy Our oF
NYRZY 148 Tidthis Month 2
W Whe Ane Diskrick Tudgg Adeh&e\ ine RePork Race Meter:
Va ARPANAK B in Ais Pedy: . Adakion On \7 7) 0\9,
; . ion For Writ of SF orag, Deoesah Ay
Recommrrdedion Stake hak T Wag granted leave Le e, . ; & Retory 3
52a APRA K RB on he Dake EOWA) Was vy a \ Seed Foren Rates?
Courk of ARPaa\s Foo De Bvevendy RUecuit 5 Y i) x "lake Wea Nhe
N ay
From MrFea\ing the Disks; CH Judge Decks ENY AN "y \ega\ Raterwlor
Courh Rouse . 8) SYON ONVIRQ) iq +o Ly, Cieeut¥ on ty gre Ostet Judge ResPonds ro Thad \ * rade Distese
JAAN ANS Angers & Secs. SeX€r Frame Exevenhh
Possible when WW Re YAY Fag Nk PQY
aS Charged § 30D. 5 Nid. How is Dade
bevthen 9 Menocalsle Distiey Toke Agrees isu, n Va ee ROR
_ : . Ne \\
asistoate P8898 Says in WiS/HR oF ee Ingy nD AS Monoraliig
Howl cag sDiskeick Svage Crane ig / Yer Mado \ —_ MaPerig,
Nok Pay ve Sieg Fee aN Say " Vaials TaN
a . a SARs Foe The Ekeventh, Crreurk Do Ant \\ +
SS MY SeeFying Be Diskesed ASAE
'CX Cows '\
S Poe Aivout he 'ing Fee
Whether the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit erred in dismissing the petitioner's appeal by stating 'Failed to Pay the Docketing & Filing Fees' where the petitioner clearly shows he was unable to pay the fees due to indigence