IN TIS CASE FIELDS' OUESTITONED PRESENTED WEITON THIS CASE. WAS IS U.S. CONSITUTIONEL LIGTTS NELE DENTED IN TRIAL COULT NIHEN LOSECUTION DENIED MIS U.S. CONSETUTIONAL LIGHTS UNDOL BATON AND HIS 14TH AMENAMENT EQUAL PROTECTION CLAE. DUE TO TITE PROSECUTION WHO STLCK TALEE POTENTIAL BLAEK OURORS INHO HAD CLOU CELAIVES FoM SBLUING ON FIEDS' JURY. BUT AUOWED TTLEE WTOT UROeS SELVE JORY WIEN WIITE On DROLD WEWT " i( UNCHAULENGEL THELETDLET WITE DRORS WHO ALE IN COMMON WITH BUACK DRE DUE TO THE FACT BLACL/ WITE DUORS BOTH HAD CLOSE LEATOKES ITH "CONVIETIONS". WIHEN WIETE JRDRS WALE TROATED DIFFLENTLY

Whether the U.S. Constitution's equal protection clause was violated when the trial court denied the petitioner's motion to dismiss due to the prosecution's use of peremptory challenges to strike all Black jurors