WHEATHER TRE LOWER COURTS ERRED IN :
Falling to oRdDER THE RESPONDENT +o Show
- CAUSE And PROVIDE. LNDOIctments, TRIaL
. TRiaL TRANSCRIPTS, Habeas CORPUS , and

all PRoceedinGS with ORDER of the STATE

Courl olseissions ALL APPELLate, BRIEFS

With the OPiNion oP the APPELLATE CouRTS,

Qs Was ORDERED to do SO) Is the Denial

OP Rotihoners Due PROcESS OF LAW ??

WHERTHER the LOWER CourTS ERRED in failing
Address Politoners Claim In Tat His Counsel. had
Rendereo ConstituTlonally Ineffective AssisTance ,
wm Failing to File. ann Reguest a hearinG on the
RoAttioners Timely Filen MoTiaw TS With DRaw his
Guwlty Plea algo not to Pursue. Pettoner's APPEAL
ReQuesT Denied PetitioneR DUE PRocess of LAW
EQual PROTECTION of LAW ane Ineffective. ASSISTance- 2¢

WHEATHER The Lowe COURTS ERRED in Failing to
address Petitioners Claim in that the TRial dudee
Failed to hear or RULE. on Petitioner's Timely Filed
Motion to WHh draw his Guilty Plea a denial oP
Que. PROCESS and EQual. PROTEET ION OF LAW 2?

WHEATHER THE LOWER COURTS ERRED In FAILING to
addeess Petitioners mistaken or FRaudu Lent
Indic MENTS in the *CR83-0742 Where there We
VALIO Sworn Testimony [nok] TRANSCRIPT of GRAND
JURY PROCEEDINGS 0@ MINUTES In SuPORT OF SaMe
Denial. of Petitioner's DUE PROCESS EQUAL PROTECTION
oF the LAW and Pioners Fith Amendment RIGHTS ? ¢

Whether the lower courts erred in failing to order the respondent to show cause and provide indictments, trial transcripts, habeas corpus, and all proceedings