No. 18-9107
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection jurisdiction question-not-identified standing takings
Latest Conference:
2020-01-17
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
THE QUESTION IS WHETHER AFTER THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS THE DISTRICT COURT AND THE STATE SUPREME COURT REFUSES TO EXERCISE JURISDICTION WHICH THEY HAD TO HEAR AND DECIDE A PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS REGARDING A JURISDICTIONAL CHALLENGE AND LEGALITY OF A COMMITMENT IS IT APPROPRIATE FOR THIS COURT TO ISSUE MANDAMUS UPON AN APPLICATION FILED TO THE SUPREME COURT AS A MATTER OF LAW.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation of the relevant legal principles and application of the facts to the law
Docket Entries
2020-01-21
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2019-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/17/2020.
2019-10-31
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2019-10-07
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2019-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-04-25
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 3, 2019)
Attorneys
Garvester Bracken
Garvester Bracken — Petitioner