No. 18-9104
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-procedure common-carrier criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-rule-16 evidence evidence-sufficiency expert-testimony firearms firearms-regulation mens-rea sentencing sentencing-review statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2019-05-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. WHETHER THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FAILED TO PROPERLY APPLY TITLE 18 U.S.C. SECTION 922(e) IN DETERMINING WHETHER THE EVIDENCE WAS SUFFICIENT TO ESTABLISH GUILT?
II. WHETHER THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FAILED TO PROPERLY APPLY RULE 16, FED.R.CRIM.P. BY ALLOWING IMPROPER EXPERT TESTIMONY AFTER THE GOVERNMENT FAILED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE NOTICE?
III. WHETHER SENTENCING ERROR WARRANTS REVIEW?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Eleventh Circuit failed to properly apply Title 18 U.S.C. Section 922(e)
Docket Entries
2019-06-03
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2019.
2019-05-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-04-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 3, 2019)
2019-02-11
Application (18A822) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until April 7, 2019.
2019-02-05
Application (18A822) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 6, 2019 to April 7, 2019, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Kurt Zamor
Richard L. Rosenbaum — Law Offices of Richard Rosenbaum, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent