WHETHER THE STATE OF FLORIDA VIOLATED PETITIONER'S
SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO THE ASSISTANCE OF
COUNSEL, WHEN POLICE INSERTED A PAID INFORMANT IN
PETITIONER'S JAIL CELL, FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF
EXTRACTING INFORMATION THAT WOULD INCULPATE
PETITIONER'S INVOLVEMENT IN UNSOLVED CRIMES THAT
WERE UNDER INVESTIGATION?

WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED IN DENYING
MORRIS' PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, ON
PROCEDURAL GROUNDS, WHERE THE ISSUES RAISED,
WOULD WORK A MANIFEST INJUSTICE, BASED ON
VIOLATION(S) OF THE FIFTH, SIXTH, AND FOURTEENTH
AMENDMENTS, WHERE POLICE TACTICS, WHICH
INCLUDED TRICKERY AND DECEPTION, WERE EMPLOYED
TO COERCE PETITIONER INTO IMPLICATING HIMSELF IN
CRIMES COMMITTED BY ANOTHER?

WHETHER PETITIONER'S PLEA WAS UNCONSTITUTIONALLY
OBTAINED, WHERE IT WAS INDUCED THROUGH PROMISE,
TRICKERY, AND THREATS, IN THE ABSENCE OF THE
ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL, MAKING THE PLEA
INVOLUNTARY AND VOID AB-INITIO?

Whether the state of Florida violated petitioner's sixth amendment right to the assistance of counsel