No. 18-9095

Michael Hall v. Brookdale University Hospital Medical Center, et al.

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2019-05-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process federal-court-jurisdiction hospital-status medical-negligence mental-health mental-hygiene-law new-york-state section-1915-review standing
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)

Clarification of the factual, exact and/or precise status of Brookdale University Hospital and Medical Center as a "Private Hospital"? As insisted from United States District Court Judge Pamela K. Chen and United States Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo.

Is Brookdale University Hospital and Medical Center in "Violation" of performing New York State Laws?

Is Brookdale University Hospital and Medical Center a New York State empowered operator in factual, precise and/or exact reference to New York State Office of Mental Health, Mental Hygiene Law?

Is it "True" that all Defendants/Respondents are in respqnsible communication?

Is Brookdale University Hospital and Medical Center a "Qualified" New York State Office of Mental Health, Catchment Hospital?

What part of the 28 U.S.C. Section 1915 (e), was relevant to the United States Court of Appeals of the Second Circuit decision for both denial and dismissal?

Are Respondents/Defendants admitting negligence without deserved remedy for failings to the injured Petitioner/Plaintiff?

Are Respondents/Defendants guilty of conspiracy, collusion and/or intent "AGAINST" both United States and New York State Constitutional Rights?

May the Supreme Court order my advisory to New York State Legislature for revision of The Mental Hygiene Law?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Clarification of the factual, exact and/or precise status of Brookdale University Hospital and Medical Center as a 'Private Hospital?

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-04-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 3, 2019)

Attorneys

Michael Hall
Michael Hall — Petitioner