No. 18-9087
Donald Durrant Farrow v. Erik A. Hooks, et al.
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process free-speech government-overreach jurisdiction standing
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
WAS THE PETITIONER DENIED MEANINGFUL ACCESS TO HIS COURTS WHEN THE PETITION WAS DISMISSED WITHOUT THE CHANCE BEING AFFORDED TO DEFETS CORRECT ANS OVERLOOKED
WAS THE PETITIONER DENIED A FAOSFLAW TO THE ENTIRE LEGAC PROFESSIONAL AMERICAN PUBLIC EXCEPTION IN FEDERAL IMPACT ON THE HORRORS INTEGRITY AND INDEPENDENCE OF THIS COURT AND UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT OVERLOOKED WITH IMPUNITY
WAS THE PETITIONER DENIED EQUAL PROTECTION AND DUE PROCESS OF LAW CLAUSE WHEN WASNT EQUAL RIGHTS AS STATES WITNESS STATEMENTS MADE AND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the Perini & Denim Menswear denied access to the courts when Perini was described as a 'Domestic Terrorist'?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2018-10-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 3, 2019)
Attorneys
Donald Durrant Farrow
Donald Durrant Farrow — Petitioner