No. 18-9080
IFP
Tags: aedpa constitutional-claims constitutional-interpretation eighth-amendment federal-habeas-review federal-review graham-v-florida habeas-corpus habeas-review judicial-interpretation legal-precedent merits-decision miller-v-alabama parole state-court-decisions supreme-court-review
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
HabeasCorpus Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Florida Supreme Court erred in treating Virginia v. LeBlanc, 137 S. Ct. 1726 (2017), a case arising under federal habeas review, as a decision on the merits of the underlying constitutional question.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Florida Supreme Court erred in treating Virginia v. LeBlanc, 137 S. Ct. 1726 (2017), as a decision on the merits of the underlying constitutional question
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-04-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 31, 2019)
2019-04-03
Application (18A1002) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until May 3, 2019.
2019-03-22
Application (18A1002) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 3, 2019 to May 3, 2019, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Joseph Carter