Did the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case for the United States Court for the Middle District of Alabama, the District Court, and the Eleventh Circuit statements in the declarations of Paschel and Smith in support of Howard's opposition by not addressing the conflict of the declarations with the findings of the investigation by FIIVIMA that Howard violated its' workplace policy misapply fundamental summary judgment principles.

Did the Magistrate Judge, District Court, and Eleventh Circuit misapply summary judgment principles by not addressing the conflict between the declarations and the investigation findings?