No. 18-9072
Dewey Lee McBride v. Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights direct-review due-process judicial-bias legal-claims ninth-circuit standing unbiased-judge
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-06-20
Question Presented (from Petition)
A. WHETHER MR. McBRIDE'S "DIRECT REVIEW" CONTINUED UNTIL HIS CLAIMS WERE DECIDED BY AN UNBIASED JUDGE
B. WHETHER DUE PROCESS REQUIRES STATES TO PROVIDE AN UNBIASED JUDGE TO DECIDE CLAIMS ON DIRECT REVIEW
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Mr. McBride's direct review continued until his claims were decided by an unbiased judge
Docket Entries
2019-06-24
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.
2019-05-13
Waiver of right of respondent Charles Ryan, Warden to respond filed.
2019-02-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 31, 2019)
Attorneys
Charles Ryan, Warden
Tanja Kelly — Arizona Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Dewey Lee McBride
Natman Schaye — Arizona Capital Representation Project, Petitioner