No. 18-9067
Sharma Ross v. Christopher Miller, Superintendent, Great Meadow Correctional Facility
IFP
Tags: civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment sixth-amendment standing
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
PETITIONER DENIED HIS DUE PROCESS RIGHTS AS ENUMERATED UNDER WAS
THE
FIFTH, SIXTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS OF THE U.S.
WHICH WERE
WERE ADMITTED AGAINST HIM AT TRIAL
INVOLUNTARILY
OBTAINED?
WAS
PETITIONER DENIED HIS DUE PROCESS RIGHTS AS ENUMERATED UNDER
THE SIXTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION,
WHEN HE WAS DEPRIVED OF THE EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was petitioner denied his due process rights as enumerated under the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-04-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 3, 2019)
Attorneys
Sharma Ross
Sharma Ross — Petitioner