No. 18-9066
Peter B. Rojas v. Jay Lane, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Fayette, et al.
IFP
Tags: does 42 U.S.C. § 2254 (e) obviate the need for fe 42-usc-2254 constitutional-provisions due-process federal-hearing habeas-corpus state-court statutory-interpretation supreme-court undeveloped-facts
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Where the State Court conducted a hearing and the party was "denied due process of law in the proceeding', does 42 U.S.C. § 2254 (e) obviate the need for federal hearing on undeveloped facts?
Does the THIRD CIRCUIT DISTRICT COURT'S decision, not to grant a hearing, conflicts between subsequent decisions of Federal Courts of Appeals and the SUPREME COURT.?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Where the State Court conducted a hearing and the party was 'denied due process of law in the proceeding
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-04-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 3, 2019)
2019-02-22
Application (18A852) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until April 18, 2019.
2019-02-04
Application (18A852) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 17, 2019 to April 18, 2019, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
Peter B. Rojas
Peter Rojas — Petitioner