No. 18-9065

Charlene Terry-Ann Walker Rosa v. Florida, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2019-05-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process fundamental-rights ineffective-assistance-of-counsel ineffective-counsel sixth-amendment strategic-decision strickland-v-washington
Latest Conference: 2019-06-20
Question Presented (from Petition)

1orwnether the us
Courtof
Appeals decision
failed to
the Us Supreme Courthrogt SH
action under recsonableness
review Counsels
before the court found
defense consels
that
strategic decision
acton was a
whether strategic
decision of defense counsel was
in proce ding, as it
unconstitutional
waived
fundamental
constitutional rights
Petitioners
by due process
Clanse which
protects
guaranteed
3
an
Whether Petitioners
claim of ineffective
counsel
prusNb
by
applid text ot
Is
Or by
strick land
dicta en cronic
e
Petuner is t
whe ther
entitled to affirmative
defense wounsels
explicit acuptunu of
strategy

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether petitioner's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is governed by the applicable test of Strickland v. Washington

Docket Entries

2019-08-23
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-08-01
DISTRIBUTED.
2019-07-02
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-06-24
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.
2019-05-31
Waiver of right of respondent Florida, et al. to respond filed.
2019-04-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 31, 2019)

Attorneys

Charlene Terry-Ann Walker Rosa
Charlene Rosa — Petitioner
Florida, et al.
Celia A. Terenzio — Respondent