No. 18-9064
Adonijah Lindsay v. United States
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: §-2255-motion §-924(c)-conviction 18-usc-924c 18-usc-924c3b certificate-of-appealability supreme-court-rule-10 third-circuit vagueness writ-of-certiorari
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does the Supreme Court's grant of writ of certiorari on the same question of law establish a per se ground for obtaining a certificate of appealability?
Is the text of 924(c)(3)(B) unconstitutionally vague?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Supreme Court's grant of writ of certiorari on the same question of law establish a per se ground for obtaining a certificate of appealability?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-09-04
Reply of petitioner Adonijah Lindsay filed. (Distributed)
2019-08-21
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2019-07-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 21, 2019.
2019-07-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 22, 2019 to August 21, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-06-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 22, 2019.
2019-06-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 20, 2019 to July 22, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-05-21
Response Requested. (Due June 20, 2019)
2019-05-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2019.
2019-05-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-04-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 31, 2019)
Attorneys
Adonijah Lindsay
Adonijah Lindsay — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent