No. 18-9046
Richard Shusterman v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-2255 certificate-of-appealability district-court due-process fourth-circuit habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel reasonable-jurists standard-of-review
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-05-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Did the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals err in deny-
ing issuance of a Certificate of Appealability of a
28 U.S.C.§ 2255 ruling when the District Court applied the wrong standard for ineffective assistance
of counsel, such that reasonable jurists could differ
on a result?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals err in denying issuance of a Certificate of Appealability of a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ruling when the District Court applied the wrong standard for ineffective assistance of counsel, such that reasonable jurists could differ on a result?
Docket Entries
2019-06-03
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2019.
2019-05-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-04-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 31, 2019)
Attorneys
Richard Shusterman
Richard Shusterman — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent