No. 18-9044

Troy Latrial Ramsey v. Jeff Premo, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-04-30
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel miller-el-standard miller-el-v-cockrell per-se-rule reasonable-jurist sixth-amendment strickland-v-washington
Latest Conference: 2019-05-30
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the Ninth Circuit's ruling denying a certificate of
appealability conflicts with this Court's ruling in Miller-El v. Cochrell,
537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003), when Mr. Ramsey presented a debatable issue
of counsel's ineffective representation under the Sixth Amendment.

2. Whether the Ninth Circuit's ruling denying a certificate of
appealability conflicts with this court's ruling in Miller-El v. Cochrell,
537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003), when the district court implicitly created a per
se rule about counsel's representation, in direct contradiction to
Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), which holds that that
counsel's representation must be assessed "considering all of the
circumstances."

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Ninth Circuit's ruling denying a certificate of appealability conflicts with this Court's ruling in Miller-El v. Cockrell

Docket Entries

2019-06-03
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2019.
2019-05-08
Waiver of right of respondent Jeff Premo to respond filed.
2019-04-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 30, 2019)

Attorneys

Jeff Premo
Benjamin Noah GutmanOregon Department of Justice, Respondent
Troy Latrial Ramsey
Kristina Signe Maria HellmanFederal Public Defender's Office--District of Oreg, Petitioner