THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED IN DENYING APPELLANT'S CLAIM THAT HIS CONVICTION WAS OBTAINED BY THE USE OF EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL SEARCH AND SEIZURE.

THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED IN DENYING APPELLANTS CLAIM THAT HE WAS DENIED HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE WHERE COUNSEL FAILED TO FILE A MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL BASED ON NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE.

THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED IN DENYING APPELLANTS CLAIM THAT HE WAS DEPRIVED OF HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF APPELLATE COUNSEL FOR FAILING TO PRESENT ISSUE THAT OCCURRED DURING TRIAL AND SENTENCING.

Whether the district court erred in denying the appellant's claims related to an unconstitutional search and seizure, ineffective assistance of trial counsel, and ineffective assistance of appellate counsel