Lochild Reed v. James Flood, Jr., Acting Warden, et al.
DueProcess
Did the District Court err by not granting an evidentiary hearing to address Seventeen (17) Constitutional Violations of gross structural errors?
Did the Fourth Circuit Court err by not granting certificate of appealability After evaluating the issuses in defendent petition that show merit enough to hold A evidentiary hearing.
Did the State Court fact finding procedure adquately Provide a full and fair hearing?
Did the prosecutor, Commit a Brady Violation concerning DNA Blood testing evidence?
Did the prosecutor commit a Brady Violation by withholding a Witness statements at trial that was favorable to the defendant case?
Istdäl counsel constitutionally ineffective by not objecting To the statements of the trial judge instructions to the jury concerning the, Mind state of intent?
Is the issuses of errors in this case structural or plain error by the Cronic Standard?
Is the State denial of petitioner Second post status a right of entitlement or due process failure by the States Post Conviction Act of 1995.
Was the trial judge in err by not declaring the trial, Void because of two felones being on the jury during deiveration.
ISstriál judge in err to aquit On two lesser counts and allowed the jury to deliverate on only the count Of First Degree Murder?
Did the District Court err by not granting an evidentiary hearing to address Constitutional Violations