Did the courts below err in applying this Court's decision in Schiup v. Delo to hold that Petitioner's compelling new evidence, though presenting at the very least a colorable claim of actual innocence, was as a matter of law insufficient to establish a reasonable doubt in regards to his guilt- merely because the evidence did not affirmatively prove his innocence?

When presented with reliable evidence in a Schlup gateway claim is there a denial of due process when there is no evidentiary hearing and the facts are conclusively presumed against a Petitioner?

Did the courts below err in applying Schlup v. Delo to hold that Petitioner's compelling new evidence was insufficient to establish reasonable doubt?