No. 18-8964
Artemio Miranda-Manuel v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 8-usc-1326 almendarez-torres apprendi criminal-procedure due-process immigration indictment prior-conviction sentencing
Latest Conference:
2019-05-23
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether this Court should consider the continuing validity of Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998), in light of the reasoning of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000).
2. Whether a prior conviction must be alleged in the indictment before a defendant is subjected to enhanced punishment under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a prior conviction must be alleged in the indictment before a defendant is subjected to enhanced punishment under 8 U.S.C. §1326(b)
Docket Entries
2019-05-28
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2019.
2019-05-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-04-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 23, 2019)
Attorneys
Artemio Miranda-Manuel
Laura G. Greenberg — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent