(a) Deprived of Advocacy (United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648 (1984), and Speedy Trial (Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972)), Instead of putting the State to its burden on the evidence my court-appointed taxpayer trial lawyer actively PURSUED forcing me to relinquish my exercise of silence of "pertinent information regarding the crimes of which [I am] accused." Appendix D, at Y1, Competency Evaluation Report, by Sean Wagner, Feb. 18, 2011), had no one to Advocate my in-court objections against the lawyers adverse position and use of disputed information developed in the course of, and in furtherance of his Incompetency evaluations (Estelle v. Smith, 454 U.S. 454 (1981)), incompetency hearings (United States v. Collins, 436 F.3d 1200 (CA10, 2005), mental hospitalizations (Vitek v. Jones, 445 U.S. 480 (1980)), and forcible administration of drugs (Bell v. United States, 539 U.S. 118 (2003), without lawyer meeting burden against me (Addington v. Texas, 441 U.S. 418 (1979), and no court officer intervened. This lasted a year.

(b) Whether Government Can Deprived Accused of his Rights By Claiming / Finding of Mentally L/Incompetent Because Of his Exercise Of Those Rights — Including Advocacy and Speedy Trial?

(2) Whether Accused's Lack of Advocacy (Cronic, supra), Can Be Justified Through Factual Disputes Arising From Uncounseled Evaluations?

Whether the lower court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims