No. 18-8953
Carol J. Morris v. Noel Francisco, Solicitor General of the United States, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-rights compensation constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection federal-jurisdiction just-compensation standing statutory-interpretation takings veterans-benefits
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-06-20
Question Presented (from Petition)
MUR OF HER ENTITLEM ENT TO JUST COMPENSATUOU: PUESUAUT
TO.TITIE 28 USC 13.58, EMWENT DOMAW STATUTE (RE:MCAD
V. CREOL JOHNENE MORRIS, TP13106, FUOO OCTOBER 15, 20/2.W
THE 142" Junc Duu Couer, MornuD Couny, Tons): USCA
COMMER CE CUAUSE, ARI I 8 CL.3): AUSO DENY HER EUTITUEHENTS TO FEDUEAL CORAM NOBUS, HABUAS CORPUS REUTET, AUD
IMMEDZATE RELENSE
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner was denied just compensation pursuant to Title 38 USC § 1151 when the Department of Veterans Affairs statute (being challenged) was deemed unconstitutional by the lower courts
Docket Entries
2019-06-24
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2019-06-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.
2019-05-22
Waiver of right of respondent Francisco, Solicitor Gen., et al. to respond filed.
2019-04-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 23, 2019)
Attorneys
Carol J. Morris
Carol Johnene Morris — Petitioner
Francisco, Solicitor Gen., et al.
Edwin Smiley Kneedler — D.O.J., Respondent