No. 18-8945

Lorraine Black v. Life Unlimited, Inc.

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-04-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-procedure discrimination due-process equal-protection retaliation standing appointment-of-counsel civil-procedure civil-rights due-process sixth-amendment standing
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Did Appellants Court ERR By acknowledging TO Reply not Brifing The Documents presented the of Lof appearance legel Repreen tation?

2. Did Appenlts Ceust alL By Not Enforcing Defamation, Retalation Papi Scttement Wo A llegatione On Race Decrimenation Liable For Falp the hecord Cvil and Constutural. Right Dolatel Sue to Miscondut By Respondento?

3. Did Counto ERR By allewing both Rospondents Registry deat wong ful, Vame oN Blactballed, Unable Oevidence while work NOT,Guilty, Closed Cace unts?

4. Did 'Couts ERC A By Cauing Conflict with ssuace mandate, Mandate Appellate Procedue 4Ca) Furet Then ised on Onder Denied Panel and Rehearing Er Bane is also ehearing denied.To Petition 28 Wat Certirari 8.

5. Did Couit Dence Proposed Scheduly elgnoe and Dis closeures? and Suffering t

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the legal standard for appointing counsel in civil rights cases violates the Sixth Amendment right to counsel?

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-08-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-17
Petition for Rehearing filed.
Main Document
2019-06-24
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.
2019-02-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 23, 2019)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Lorraine Black
Lorraine Black — Petitioner