No. 18-8938

Elza Budagova v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-04-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: apprendi apprendi-rule constitutional-procedure criminal-fines criminal-restitution judicial-discretion jury-findings sentencing sentencing-exposure southern-union-co
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)

Should Apprendi's rule apply to the imposition of criminal restitution?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Should Apprendi's rule apply to the imposition of criminal restitution?

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-01
Reply of petitioner Elza Budagova filed.
Main Document
2019-07-22
Brief of respondent United States of America in opposition filed.
Certificate of Word CountMain Document
2019-06-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including July 22, 2019.
2019-06-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 21, 2019 to July 22, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
Main Document
2019-05-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 21, 2019.
2019-05-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 22, 2019 to June 21, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
Main Document
2019-04-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 22, 2019)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixAppendixAppendixAppendixAppendixAppendix

Attorneys

Elza Budagova
David Andrew Schlesinger — Jacobs & Schlesinger LLP, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent