Should the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals have considered Petitioner's timely filed Amended Certificate of Appealability and Motion to Expand the Amended Certificate of Appealability under the mailbox rule, notwithstanding that the motions were returned by the United States Postal Service with loose contents, and subsequently re-mailed by Petitioner after receipt, where Petitioner had no control over the postal service error and the motions were timely filed under the mailbox rule as established in Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266?

Whether the Petitioner's Sixth Amendment right to counsel was violated when the indictment was amended during a critical stage of the proceedings without the presence of counsel