No. 18-8920
Charles Franklin Glasscock v. Jeri Taylor
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-law constitutional-rights criminal-procedure defense-counsel due-process effective-counsel habeas-corpus impartial-jury memorandum-decision ninth-circuit supreme-court
Latest Conference:
2019-05-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does the Ninth Circuit's memorandum decision, affirming the denial of habeas corpus relief, contravene this Court's commands regarding the vital guarantees of effective defense counsel and an impartial jury?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Ninth Circuit's memorandum decision, affirming the denial of habeas corpus relief, contravene this Court's commands regarding the vital guarantees of effective defense counsel and an impartial jury?
Docket Entries
2019-05-20
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.
2019-04-24
Waiver of right of respondent Jeri Taylor to respond filed.
2019-04-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 20, 2019)
Attorneys
Charles Glasscock
Jeri Taylor
Benjamin Noah Gutman — Oregon Department of Justice, Respondent