No. 18-8919
In Re Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law appellate-procedure appellate-review civil-procedure court-order due-process equal-protection judicial-discretion judicial-review legal-review mandamus procedural-due-process standing
Latest Conference:
2019-06-13
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does any Court have a legal right to issue a dispositive Order without a detailed explanation about why this decision was reached?
Does any Court have a legal right to prohibit a Plaintiff to file a Motion for Clarification, a Motion for Reconsideration, etc.?
Does any Court have a legal right to refuse to entertain the Plaintiff's subsequent filings without the explanation?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does any Court have a legal right to issue a dispositive Order without a detailed explanation about why this decision was reached?
Docket Entries
2019-06-17
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2019.
2019-05-20
Waiver of right of respondent UNITED STATES to respond filed.
2019-04-16
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 20, 2019)
Attorneys
Tatyana E. Drevaleva
Tatyana E. Drevaleva — Petitioner
UNITED STATES
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent