No. 18-8918

David Wiley v. Jennifer Wiley

Lower Court: Washington
Docketed: 2019-04-19
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: best-interests-of-child bills-of-attainder child-support due-process judicial-discretion parent-child-relationship
Latest Conference: 2019-06-20
Question Presented (from Petition)

Is the Fundamental Right to the Parent-Child relationship at stake during the dissolution process?

Do State Court Judges have the legal discretion to make prejudicial determinations as to the best interests of a child?

Does the levying of Child Support to apply to all non-custodial Parents violate the U.S. Constitutional prohibition on Bills of Attainder?

Does a trial court judge have the authority to admit evidence not authorization by law and over an objection of a litigant?

Does Due Process require that our lower courts make findings of fact regarding testimony of a petitioner-witness who admits having knowingly made false statements under oath?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Question not identified

Docket Entries

2019-06-24
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.
2019-02-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 20, 2019)

Attorneys

David Wiley
David Wiley — Petitioner