No. 18-8887

Miriam Soler v. Capital One Auto Finance

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2019-04-19
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appeal appellate-review bankruptcy bankruptcy-procedure constitutional-interpretation courts-of-appeal due-process ex-post-facto ex-post-facto-clause federal-rules-of-bankruptcy-procedure original-jurisdiction rule-of-law
Latest Conference: 2019-06-20
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals infringed the ex post facto clause, depriving Petitioner's right of remedy sustaining no due process at all ever existed below and up to above, by applying the amended rule eff. 12/1/2017 retrospectively to affirm the appeal and not instead applying the rule that was under review the pre-amended rule from proceeding in 2016.

Whether the Court as "original jurisdiction" to review the Courts of Appeal noncompliance with this Court's directives on the application of amend/new rule to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals infringed the ex-post-facto-clause, depriving Petitioner's right of remedy sustaining no due-process at all ever existed

Docket Entries

2019-06-24
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.
2019-04-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 20, 2019)

Attorneys

Miriam Soler
Miriam Soler — Petitioner