No. 18-887
California Trucking Association v. Julie A. Su
Tags: california-labor-commissioner employment-classification federal-aviation-act federal-aviation-administration-authorization-act labor-commissioner motor-carrier motor-carrier-preemption motor-carriers owner-operator owner-operator-contracts owner-operators preemption transportation-deregulation transportation-industry workforce-exclusion
Latest Conference:
2019-03-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Ninth Circuit err by holding the FA does not preempt California's interference with contractual agreements between motor carriers and owner-operators based on its creation of a "workforce exclusion" to preemption?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Ninth Circuit err by holding the FA does not preempt California's interference with contractual agreements between motor carriers and owner-operators based on its creation of a 'workforce exclusion' to preemption?
Docket Entries
2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-01-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 8, 2019)
2018-11-26
Application (18A549) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until January 9, 2019.
2018-11-21
Application (18A549) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 9, 2018 to January 9, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.