GROUND ONE
Whether State's highest court errs by refusing to remedy a Prisoner's Miscarriage of Justice claim, abuse of discretion and cause of willful Perjury: uncorrected Prosecution that continues to taint the APPEALS Process for all parties involved.

GROUND THREE
Whether Prisoner appellate Counsel's testimony at habeas hearing is Constitutionally admissible, when at time Appellate Counsel for County Prosecution actively working who've Just convicted Prosecution—who've Counsel's, client and whom appellate Counsel recently challenged on direct appeal two months Prior new employment wsith Convicting Prosecution.

Whether a State's highest court errs, and abuses discretion by refusing to remedy a prisoner's miscarriage of justice claim, critical to all parties involved for cause of will of USC of Per and uncorrected by litigation that casts a taint the Trials Process