No. 18-8849

Keith Andre Robinson v. H. White, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-04-16
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 4th-amendment civil-rights due-process exigent-circumstances fourth-amendment probable-cause qualified-immunity search-and-seizure standing warrantless-search
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-06-13
Question Presented (from Petition)

Did the Court of Appeals err in the application of the abstention doctrine in Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 43 (1971) with this decision when exhibits showed the Norfolk Police Dept.'s misconduct to this Court supporting Petitioner's plea of Fourth Amendment violations?

Did the Court of Appeals err in denying Petitioner's Petition for Rehearing and Rehearing en banc after not acknowledging that Petitioner's criminal matter was concluded on [date] 2018, which directly goes against the previous judicial ruling with the application of the abstention doctrine in which case the District Court and the Court of Appeals solely relied on this circumstance to prevent both Courts from acknowledging this civil claim?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the District Court err in finding that no exigent circumstances were present to justify the warrantless search and seizure of Petitioner's home and person?

Docket Entries

2019-06-17
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2019.
2019-04-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 16, 2019)

Attorneys

Keith Andre Robinson
Keith Andre Robinson — Petitioner