No. 18-8826
Omar Christopher Miller v. United States
Tags: circuit-split constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process impartial-jury juror-bias jury-impartiality law-enforcement sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-10-11
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury is violated
when prospective jurors are allowed to conceal facts that indicate
possible bias - including, as here, ties to law enforcement if they
"feel, personally," they can be fair.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury is violated
Docket Entries
2019-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-20
Reply of petitioner Omar Christopher Miller filed. (Distributed)
2019-09-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-09-05
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2019-06-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 5, 2019.
2019-06-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 15, 2019 to September 5, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-06-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 15, 2019.
2019-06-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 13, 2019 to July 15, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-05-14
Response Requested. (Due June 13, 2019)
2019-05-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2019.
2019-04-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-04-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 15, 2019)
Attorneys
Omar Christopher Miller
Matthew B. Larsen — Federal Defenders of New York, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent