No. 18-8821
Sealed Appellant v. Sealed Appellee
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 18-usc-3582 18-usc-3582c2 5k1.1-motion criminal-sentencing judicial-discretion koons-v-united-states mandatory-minimum sentence-reduction sentencing-commission sentencing-guidelines substantial-assistance
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-05-16
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Can a defendant receive a 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) sentence reduction when the district court discarded the mandatory minimum because of a substantial-assistance motion and considered the initial guidelines range before imposing the sentence?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can a defendant receive a 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) sentence reduction when the district court discarded the mandatory minimum because of a substantial-assistance motion and considered the initial guidelines range before imposing the sentence?
Docket Entries
2019-05-20
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.
2019-04-26
Waiver of right of respondent Sealed Appellee to respond filed.
2019-04-15
Motion (18M131) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record Granted.
2019-03-27
MOTION (18M131) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-07
Motion (18M131) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record filed.
2019-03-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 15, 2019)
Attorneys
Sealed Appellant
Kristin M. Kimmelman — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Sealed Appellee
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent