I. Whether parties to a criminal action must lodge a separate objection to the failure of a district court to address substantial arguments for a different sentence, or whether the request for a different sentence, together with the grounds proffered therefor, preserves error?

II. Whether 18 U.S.C. §2113(a) is divisible for purposes of categorical analysis?

Subsidiary question: whether this Petition should be held in light of United States v. Davis, __U.S.__, 139 S.Ct. 782 (Certiorari Granted January 4, 2019)(18-431).

Whether parties to a criminal action must lodge a separate objection to the failure of a district court to address substantial arguments for a different sentence, or whether the request for a different sentence, together with the grounds proffered therefor, preserves error?