THE COURT BELOW COMMIT AN ERROR SO IMPORTANT THAT IT AS LAW AND FACTS SHOULD COMPELL JUDGES. THE DAMAGING ERROK OF THE COURTS DECISION ULTIMATELY HAS LEE T THE CHILDREN TI+INKING THEY AnE ABANDED BY FAMILY . UITH TOTAL 15SOLATION FROM ANY RELATIVE FOR 1'2 YEARS. 3 YEARS IN STATE CUSTODY WHILE. THEIR BROTHEN HAWK CAMBRON YD. HAS BEEN CERTIFIED FOR. ADOPTING TI5 CHILDREN IN LOUISIANINA. TO AVOID THF CONTINVED ENDANGERMSNT OF. TIHE CHILDREN, THEY SHOULD B5 RELEASED TO THEIR ••. BNOTHER WHILE COURT MATTERS ARE PENDTHE DCF HAS TO SHOW BY CLEAN AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE TO THEGNOUND OF CASE PLAN COMPLIANCE.THE DEPANT MENT FAILED TO DO THIS.THERE WAS NO EVIDE NCE THMT THE.CHILDRENSUEFERED HARM, INJURY ON PHYSICAL, MENTAL OR EMOTIONAL HARV BY THS PANENTS

WILL. THIS COURT ALiOW A DISTRAVGHTMOTAEN. TOFILE THIS WRIT OF CERTIORARI THAT MOST LIKELY NOT CORRECT ACCONDING 7 TO THE FLLING STANDARD? THE IMPONTANCE TO THESE CHILDREN AND. TO OTHER CHILDREN TO BE IN A SAFE AND LOVING HOME SHOULD B5 THE FOCUS OF GRANTING T\E}$PETITION. LET US LOOK AT THE TRUTH + FACT. THERE ARE DRASTIC CHANGFS THAT NEED TO BE UADE TOS DCF LAW ENFONCEMENT, D O.J. TIIS IS SOMETHING THIS COUNT HAS 9 THE ABILITY TO DO. TAESE AGENCIES THAT ANE IN A POSITION OF PUBULC TRUST WILL CONTINVE TO BREAK TH5 WAW IF THIS IS NOT ADDNESSED IMMEDIATELY. THIS CASE PRESENTS ISSUES OF I.MPORTANCE BEYONO PARTICULAR FACTS AND PARTIES INVOLVED.

WAS. AFALSE FUSION EXCHANGE INTELLIGENCE BULLETIN, SLANDERING THE. TO INFLVENC5 PANENTS .USED. A COUNT PROCEEDING? THE THAT . POLICE ALERT.CODES OFFICERS KEEP ON AMERICANS THAT HAVE THAT MAY HAVE NO CRIMINAL RECORD. CLEANLY HAS CAUSED AN HYSTERIA. IN THE LAW ENFORCEMENT COMMUNITY WHILE USING IT TO ATTACK AMENICAN FAMILIES. IT IS UNLAWFUL.. FOR DISSEMINATION TO AMY OTHER PERSON OTHER THAN LAW ENFONCENIEWT. THE JUDGES THAT MADI DECISIONs ON THESE CASES WERE INFLUENCED B.y A BULLETIN THIS S A FOLONY

DID THE DISTNLCTCOURT ERROR SUBSTANTIALLY. THE PROBINCREUSF ABILITY OF THE BeING CHILDREN HARMED? To TERMINATE THE RIGHTS PARENTS OF WHO HAVE HOMESCHOOLED 3 OF THEIR 5 CHILDREN TO BE DUCTONS GRADVATING THE TOP OF THEIR CLASS IS A CLEAR ERROR P THEIR CHILDHOOD NOW GONE, AS WELL AS THEIR HAPPY LUXVRIOUS HOME. NOW

Whether the Supreme Court will allow a distressed parent to file this writ of certiorari that most likely will not correct according to the prevailing standard