No. 18-8799
Robert Gordon Lockwood v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: bank-robbery bank-robbery-statute categorical-approach crime-of-violence criminal-law descamps-ruling due-process firearms johnson-ruling mathis-ruling ninth-circuit sentencing statutory-interpretation supreme-court supreme-court-precedent violent-crime
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Immigration
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-05-23
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals violate the Johnson, Mathis, Descamps, and Dimaya Supreme Court rulings because Prince confirmed that the Bank Robbery Statue has non-violent elements?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals violate the Johnson, Mathis, Descamps, and Dimaya Supreme Court rulings because Prince confirmed that the Bank Robbery Statue has non-violent elements?
Docket Entries
2019-05-28
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2019.
2019-04-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-01-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 13, 2019)
Attorneys
Robert Lockwood
Robert Gordon Lockwood — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent