No. 18-8794
Ricky Raymond Ball v. United States
Tags: appeal-waiver criminal-procedure due-process judicial-explanation manifest-injustice plea-agreement plea-bargaining supervised-release
Latest Conference:
2019-05-23
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether Mr. Ball can be held to his waiver under Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(b)(1)(N) when, rather than informing Mr. Ball of the extent to which he was waiving his right to appeal, the magistrate judge simply referred to the relevant plea agreement provision by page and paragraph number, and asked Mr. Ball if he understood it?
2. Whether allowing the enforcement of an appeal waiver to prevent review of oppressive supervised release conditions unrelated to Mr. Ball's offense conduct would result in manifest injustice?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Mr. Ball can be held to his waiver under Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(b)(1)(N)
Docket Entries
2019-05-28
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2019.
2019-04-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-04-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 13, 2019)
Attorneys
Ricky Ball
Elizabeth Unger Carlyle — Carlyle Parish LLC, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent