WHETHER THE 11TH CIRCUIT COURTS MUST SUPPRESS THE FRUITS OF
THE ADMITTED TO ILLEGAL SEARCH AND SEIZURE, WHICH OCCURED
OUTSIDE OF THEIR RESPECTIVE. -JURISDICTION AND WAS BASED UPON.A
PIECE MEAL WARRANT AND ILLEGAL SEARCHING OF PHONE AND CURTILAGE

WHETHER THE CAREER OFFENDER SENTENCE MUST BE VACATED WHEN THE
STATE HAS CONCEDED THAT THE PETITIONER WAS SENTENCED INCORRECTLY
TWICE, AND THE EX POST FACTO VIOLATIONS OCCURED IN BOTH PRIORS
RELIED UPON BY THE DISTRICT COURT?

D113 THE COA PANEL VIOLATE THE BUCK V DAVIS RULING WHEN IT
CLEARLY PERFORMED A MERITS ANALYSIS ON THE COA STAGE & DOES IT
REQUIRE THEJUDGMENT TO BE VACATED SO THAT THE PETITIONER MAY
BE HEARD ON THE MERITS?

Whether the 11th Circuit courts must suppress the fruits of the admitted to illegal search and seizure