No. 18-8777

Salim Abdu Gould v. North Carolina

Lower Court: North Carolina
Docketed: 2019-04-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: admissibility-of-evidence criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process indictment ineffective-assistance-of-counsel self-representation subject-matter-jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2019-05-16
Question Presented (from Petition)

I. Did Trial Counsel Error in Denial of Pretrial Motions Prose Before the Appointment of Counsel? If Motions Entertained Pro Se, Does Petitioner bear the Right to Present Issues on Appeal? When Invoked, Is one entitled to the Right of Self-Representation?

II. Original Indictment Fatlaw ns Fce, Does A Petition sought by the Empaneling of a second Grand Jury to seek A second Indictment from same information After five years Constitute Double Jeopardy? If Originally Hawed, without A Bill of Particulars or A Amendment, Does Jurisdiction Over Subject Matter Exist?

III. Will Doctored Identification Testimony Constitute a valid Conviction?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the petitioner was denied due process and the right to self-representation before the appointment of counsel and during the motions entertained pro se, and whether the petitioner was subjected to double jeopardy when a second grand jury was empaneled to seek a second indictment after five years

Docket Entries

2019-05-20
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.
2019-04-29
Waiver of right of respondent State of North Carolina to respond filed.
2018-11-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 10, 2019)

Attorneys

Salim Abdu Gould
Abdu Salim Gould — Petitioner
State of North Carolina
Daniel Patrick O'BrienNC Department of Justice, Respondent