No. 18-8776
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (5)IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights daubert-standard due-process expert-testimony fair-trial fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment ineffective-assistance-of-counsel non-unanimous-jury sixth-amendment
Latest Conference:
2021-05-20
(distributed 5 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Reasonable jurors would determined that Mr. Le was convicted by a non-unanimous jury in violation of his rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments and equivalent provisions of the Louisiana Constitution.
Reasonable jurors would debate that Mr. Le was denied a fair and impartial trial with the submission of testimony from "Expert" witnesses which failed to meet the Daubert standard, in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Mr. Le was convicted by a non-unanimous jury in violation of his rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments
Docket Entries
2021-05-24
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/20/2021.
2020-04-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/1/2020.
2020-04-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/24/2020.
2019-09-24
Reply of petitioner Tam Le filed.
2019-07-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-27
Brief of respondent Louisiana in opposition filed.
2019-05-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 27, 2019.
2019-05-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 28, 2019 to June 27, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-04-25
Response Requested. (Due May 28, 2019)
2019-04-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-04-16
Waiver of right of respondent Louisiana to respond filed.
2019-04-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 10, 2019)
Attorneys
Louisiana
Michelle Ward Ghetti — Attorney General, State of Louisiana, Respondent