No. 18-8762
Jason Curtis Brown v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 6th-amendment constitutional-rights criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process fifth-amendment indictment remand standing superceding-indictment superseding-indictment
Latest Conference:
2019-05-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER S FIFTH. AMENDMENT RIGHT TO DOUBLE JEOPARDY, DUE PROCESS AND THE EXPRESSED TERMS OF THE 6TH CIR. COURT OF APPEALS LIMITED REMAND ORDER WERE VIOLATED WHEN THE DISTRICT COURT PERMITTED THE GOVERNMENT TO FILE A SECOND (SUPERCEDING) INDICTMENT BEFORE DISMISSING THE ORIGINAL INDICTMENT THAT JEOPARDY HAD ALREADY ATTACHED TO...
WHETHER THIS COURTS HOLDING IN GLASS V. UNITED STATES #16-424 (2018) ANDTHIS COURTS PRIOR RULINGS UPHELD BY CLASS APPLIES ALSO TOBROWN'S CONSTITUTIONAL CLAIM
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Brown's Fifth Amendment right to double jeopardy, due process and the expressed terms of the 6th Cir. Court of Appeals limited remand order were violated
Docket Entries
2019-06-03
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2019.
2019-05-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-05-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 9, 2019)
Attorneys
Jason Brown
Jason Curtis Brown — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent