(1) Is a sentence as a career offender (com) unvalied se valid when a fone violent ors conviction, (Kloada attery on Law en Mv Licey), LO au by wily o€ the Con tender Soone, tao y ASE déemeef vnconstitutiong| in hight of the supreme courts deasion IY. SE59IONS YV Dimaya; 13¥ $-C+. 1204 (201%) an extension ef it's deasion in Jolnson v nded Sees) 135, ae 2551 Ba) thet sad a stake tee! len ang he AeLH resul is also oncorettes tend be ott reodval chyise

(2) 2d Ded the ovemment and FBI agents conpiee and wduce eked Janes ivan ha i comens we comes of LQrernr eT COCAINE have other se, committees > left alone he woolel aot

(3) \Was the proseestec} Coceecinas aagcunst James B- Jones o%) unavthorizee| arcl regen Lhe sole stack coort Savannah divegion having | veavthort persone | actin) as Resistant 01%. affecnuys having ne Completect the Maid atect ap cintintfect bicate alhdan Signed notary cecf onel sent to fie execbtye office for U.S. attorneys Department ot yosteee bortlin the required Mart) that Geary ; Su posed | Assistant U-S. Aor aes eee vecholla, Fredack wl teen Ievamer TE anel Joseph D! Newmen ?

(4) 1s use wf nen-wlent Fonda Bubtery pn lad enlorcement for an enhancement under the threce criminal act Conary to the yeh cwort court of peal dearnon im TF Williams vy US. 2010 we peraiay tier 2010) ane the syprane court holeluny in Johnson v U.S. 130 S-C# ILS (U.S. 2010)?

(5) Did the UM cio court of appeal violate Nemes - Sency Je const lutengl cight of cedltfos diseuss ine hig 224/ nabeas cor pos Por bein unable to eey t; 'ag fee ce. still serving a [bed month sentence att. Gyrs<

Whether a sentence as a career offender (ACCA) is valid when a prior violent offense conviction (Florida battery on law enforcement), deemed unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Sessions v. Dimaya, 138 S.Ct. 1204 (2018) and extension of its decision in Johnson v. United States, 135 S.Ct. 2551 (2015), is also considered unconstitutional and be removed