No. 18-8751

William Len Rainey v. Texas

Lower Court: Texas
Docketed: 2019-04-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights confrontation-clause discovery due-process hearsay sentencing-enhancement sentencing-enhancements sexual-offenses
Latest Conference: 2019-06-06
Question Presented (from Petition)

unconstitutional as appliedinatrialon Sept.21, 201 denying the Petitioner basc Duc rocess
protections and affetihis substatialrights?

AWe e
investigative records ifsaid witness testifis regarding his investgation of the 3. ofense
andenc

B.
a
CW


in its Final Charge?


tochingofh t ofnntpane
en it is imassble to detormire which
ateahjrelpnofefendantuily?

F. Whethr the Statut permits te Sta to u the sameextan fen t oth pranessent
clament in the indicted oftense and to eshance the defendants sentene to autamatlite?

I
pos nien efnnt n rc en

A. Whether a counse verbalagrment nreord violates Texas Pend Codes aw agaist Theft
ofServi ypn ating the SAd th U. Coto

he fa he t cl
at least one witness?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Part 33.37 is unconstitutional as applied at trial on June 24, 2013, denying the petitioner basic Due Process protections and his substantial rights?

Docket Entries

2019-06-10
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2019.
2019-03-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 10, 2019)

Attorneys

William Len Rainey
William Rainey — Petitioner