With the Record Reflecting that the alleged victim consented to engaging in Sexual intercourse—Should Noguera have been convicted of Sexual Assault?

Did the Trial Judge Violate Noguera's 14th Amendment Right to Due Process of law for failing to charge the Jury instructions on Voluntary consent?

Could any Rational trier of fact have found Noguera guilty of Sexual Assault or essential elements of crime beyond a reasonable doubt had the Jury known about the Voluntary Consent of both the alleged Victim[s.G.7?

With the Records Reflecting that everyone agreed that the alleged victim allegedly consented including the alleged victim Should Noguera have been Charged with any Kind of Sexual assault?

Was the state courts decision objectively unreasonable in denying Noguera's request to instruct the Jury on consent of the alleged victim?

By the alleged victim Stating on the witness Stand that She did not consider the possibility of Pregnancy when she agreed to intercourse Show consent and Knowledge and was not a crime of Sexual Assault?

Whether the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment was violated when the petitioner was subjected to excessive force and denied adequate medical care while incarcerated